
So What?
So what? So WHAT? Are you kidding?
We are talking about the event that changed
everything. Everything. What has it not changed for you?
We long for the day when we will turn
our swords into plowshares. We long for the day when the meek will inherit
the earth. We long for the day when every tear will be wiped away and all
things will be made new. That is, we long for the day God puts everything
under the feet of Jesus, including all of human history and all of creation,
and Jesus in turn gives back to his Father, the Creator of heaven and earth,
a restored creation, redeemed with a price.
Until then we live between the times,
in memory and in hope. The message of the resurrection is that God is not
coming back to raise hell, but to consummate the destruction of the roots
of hell, mimetic violent contagion. The Cross of Christ effectively did just
that. The resurrection lets us know about it. Today, we have real reason to
rejoice. We have real reason for our hearts to swell, for our minds to expand,
for our hope to be secured. This is the day that begins the deconstruction
of all religion, as we know it, including the Christian religion.
As we write this, we are but less than
a week into the war with Iraq, so we cannot be too current with our comments.
It may be that between the time this is written and the week you will use
it, major events will have occurred in this war.
We wish to say that every casualty brings
grief to our hearts, especially coalition forces and Iraqi civilian populations.
It is deplorable that the Hussein regime is using civilian populations as
cover in this war. We cannot see into the future between now and then but
we suspect it will be a long and difficult struggle. This is the problem with
a being part of a species that possesses ‘the knowledge of good and
evil,’ something it was never intended to possess.
One can only hope that the war will
be over quickly and that the world will do its part in healing Iraq and Afghanistan.
On this Easter Sunday we ask a blessing on our Muslim brothers and sisters.
May they dwell in peace. May there develop a real peace in the land of Jesus.
And may God graciously reveal to the Christian churches the power and character
of his love and mercy, his covenant faithfulness and his care for all humanity.
Christ is Risen! Hallelujah!
2006:
Does the Risen Jesus make a difference
in our lives? He made a huge difference in the lives of apostles and the communities
that they founded. His resurrection puts to death the lie of death, the guilt
of the victim; by exposing the lie, death itself dies and is powerless over
humanity and the creation.
The celebration of the Risen Jesus can
only be full of joy that history does not end with a whimper but with a cry
of exaltation and victory, the victory won by the Lamb that was slain. Since
we share in Jesus’ cross, we also share in his resurrection, and all
that it promises in all of its benefits. We are given the fullness of the
Spirit as a down payment of this future gift.
Our celebration of his feast today is
as political as it is spiritual, for by breaking bread on Easter, we proclaim
that it is not the principalities and powers who win the day. It is Jesus
Christ, Risen Savior, Glorious Lord whom we worship and adore. Today it is
His healing that is vindicated, His inclusiveness, His love, His forgiveness,
His casting out of demons, His peacemaking teaching that is all vindicated.
His is the life and message we proclaim.
Hallelujah, Christ is Risen!
Anthropological Reading
On Christmas morning the angels did herald
“Peace on earth.” On this day, the exact same word is brought
to humanity. “Peace” announces the Risen Jesus!
The resurrection of Jesus from the dead is the vindication of Jesus’
work, life, teaching and death. It is, in short, the vindication of the messenger,
the agent of God. It is the vindication of the message of peace.
Popular Christianity does not know what
to do with Easter Sunday, for while the average churchgoer may believe that
God did indeed raise Jesus from the dead, it really does not have any significance
for them except perhaps to provide consolation beyond death. Some use Easter
morning as a proof that in raising Jesus from the dead, God sets the balance
right after destroying Jesus with his wrath only days before. Others sit in
the pews and wonder about the concept of resurrection preferring reincarnation
instead. Many are just trying to stay awake. Resurrection, smesurrection,
we hear the same old thing every year.
The resurrection reveals the wonder
of the love of God in the Cross. Had there been no resurrection, God might
have loved us in the death of Jesus but we never would have been able to tell
the story that way. Jesus would have remained a small and insignificant footnote
to Jewish history, if her were noticed at all. Because of the resurrection,
something is known. Something has occurred that is so extraordinary that it
is the ‘shock and awe’ of history. God has placed His stamp of
approval on Jesus in raising him from the dead and opening the way for us
to share with him in the resurrection from the dead.
Resurrection gives meaning to life.
You and I are both one day closer to death today than we were yesterday. We
may even fear the process of dying. But our death is not an end. It is a beginning,
a chance to start all over, new and fresh, as a human being living on this
earth in the new creation.
The resurrection of Jesus from the dead
is aptly called an eschatological event, and it is. It is the presence of
the eschatological Jesus that creates for us, as it did for the disciples,
an ‘eschatological present.’ In his presence and led by his Spirit,
we can actually chose to live now as we will live then. There is no separation
of ethics and eschatology. All Christian ethics are eschatological. So how
will we behave then, how will we live, what does life look like? It looks
a lot like Jesus. It looks the way relationships grounded in love, mercy and
forgiveness look. It has nothing to do with compliance to external regulation.
It has everything to do with the obedience to God who is love. Eschatology
is not a quantifiable phenomenon, except as it breaks into our relationships
where we intentionally seek to live NOW as we will live THEN. At that point,
in conformity to the presence of Jesus Christ who is the same yesterday, today
and forever, we speak in our actions, and act in our speech; we communicate
the promise of the hope and joy that we share in Jesus Christ.
The resurrection of Jesus has been,
for some, nothing more than another ancient expression of the dying and rising
god myth. We have seen that myths represent to us a foundational narrative
of the scapegoating mechanism and that the gospel shares the same structure.
But at this significant turning point there is a complete disjunction between
the gospel and myth. The gospel does not “sacralize” Jesus. Rather,
his resurrection is a disturbance in the cosmos.
In the Introductory Essays we spelled
out in brief the process of sacralization, the process whereby the community
has its perception shifted regarding the victim. The victim is transformed
from guilty party to acceptable sacrifice and the benefits accrued from the
sacrifice of the mob are attributed to the victim. The victim is divinized.
Two things arise from this, language (the symbol), and religion. And voila!
A transformed scapegoat all dressed up to join the gods’ ball. History
is littered with the corpses of our ‘gods.’
In the resurrection, Jesus is ‘divinized’,
that is, given divine recognition and approval. But we should not mistake
this for the divinization of the mimetic mechanism. Divinization or sacralization
in the mimetic mechanism is the originary lie, the cover-up, the beginning
of mythology and our spiral of self-deception. The ‘divinization’
of Jesus in the resurrection is the acknowledgement of the truth. His hands,
feet and side are all testimony to this. There will be no denying what has
occurred to him. We see at every turn the challenge of God in Christ to the
mimetic scapegoating mechanism, how at every significant point it is challenged
and beaten.
This appears to be the underlying motif
of the early Christian preaching. Romans 1:2, Phil 2: 5-11, Acts 2-4. It is
not necessary to speculate metaphysically. What is important is to see that
it is the kind of life Jesus lived that is being vindicated. From beginning
to end and beyond, the entire story of Jesus counts. The resurrection opens
us up to hear and obey, to no longer live with Jesus uncomprehending and dull.
It points the way for us to see both the past and future. It gives real meaning
to the present.
If the Cross allows us to do anthropology,
it is the resurrection that allows us to do theology. It is in the Cross we
first learn about ourselves, and in the resurrection we learn about God. Rene
Girard (I See Satan Fall Like Lightning) says it well:
“Until now I have always been
able to find plausible responses to the questions posed in this book within
a purely commonsensical and ‘anthropological’ context. This time,
however, it is impossible. To break the power of mimetic unanimity, we must
postulate a power superior to violent contagion. If we have learned one thing
in this study, it is that none exists on the earth. It is precisely because
violent contagion was all-powerful in human societies, prior to the day of
the resurrection, that archaic religion divinized it. They had good reason
to mistake violent unanimity for divine power.
The Resurrection is not only a miracle,
a prodigious transgression of natural laws. It is a spectacular sign of the
entrance into the world of a power superior to violent contagion. By contrast
to the latter it is a power not at all hallucinatory or deceptive. Far from
deceiving the disciples, it enables them to recognize what they had not recognized
before and to reproach themselves for their pathetic flight in the preceeding
days. They acknowledge their guilt in the violent contagion that murdered
their master.”
But there is more. The resurrection
of Jesus is about transformation. It is both promise and reality. It is about
the transformation of creation by the grace and mercy of God. The transformation
is possible because of the forgiveness expressed in the Cross. Just as Jesus
forgave those who crucified him, so God forgives us when we crucify others,
sometimes in thought, sometimes by word, and other times by deed, personal
or political.
It is a transformation in our thinking
as well. It points the way to faith in a consistent God who does not change.
Those of us who have heard the gospel message have an insider’s track
on what God is doing with time and history. Apart from the resurrection, history
is the meaning-less account of humans fighting amongst themselves. The current
‘media’ war (embedded journalists, etc) we are watching on our
TV’s should alone persuade us of this. Anyone recall the twentieth century?
It was the Century of War.
Friends, there is so much more we could
say, but we are not writing a book. We are trying to stimulate your thinking.
More so, we rejoice together with you in the life we celebrate and live in
the Lord Jesus. May the peace of God blow through your lives, a mighty eschatological
wind, the creative breath of God, and may you find peace.
Historical Cultural
The Johannine story of the resurrection
of Jesus is in many ways quite different than the Synoptics. This should not
surprise anyone by now. We have seen all along what can be called ‘the
Johannine difference.’
For starters we recall what appears to
be a fixed formula in Paul written in a letter to the Corinthians in the early
50’s (I Cor 15:3-7). The same formula is used when indicating the passing
on the eucharistic tradition in I Cor 11. In both cases it would seem that
we have a certain way of framing the resurrection appearances. Only Peter,
James the brother of Jesus and apparently Paul were given personal appearances.
The appearances to Peter and James are not recorded in the gospel tradition.
Mark, if we should stick with the shorter
ending, has no resurrection appearances.
Matthew records that Mary Magdalene
and ‘the other Mary’ went to see the tomb. Upon leaving the tomb
they are encountered by Jesus, where “they came upon him, took hold
of his feet and worshipped him.” Jesus sends them to tell ‘my
brethren to go to Galilee’ whereupon they go and he appears to the eleven.
Luke writes that (anonymous) ‘women
who had come with Jesus from Galilee’ went to the tomb. Luke has an
entourage: Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James and the
other women with them. Then comes the appearance to the two unnamed disciples
on the road to Emmaus. Then Jesus appears before the eleven in the presence
of the travelers from Emmaus.
All three gospels place Mary Magdalene
in the group of women that go to the tomb. The Fourth Gospel contains the
only personal appearance story, that of Jesus to Mary of Magdala. There may
be several reasons why this is so.
First, it is possible that it is ‘the
way it happened.’ It’s possible. Second, the record of the personal
appearance to Mary left its mark in the tradition as both Matthew and John
(who have nothing to do with one another) note that Mary (John) or ‘the
two Mary’s’ (Matthew) ‘grasped Jesus.’
There is a real tenderness in the appearance
of Jesus to Mary Magdalene, in which we see the threads of a real relationship,
a loving relationship. We are not thinking sexually here; we do not need to
create what the text does not suggest. We would note that the Fourth Gospel
is written by a close intimate of Jesus who along with Mary Magdalene stood
at the Cross, unlike all of the other disciples. Unlike the appearances to
the other followers of Jesus, the appearance to Mary can be told, for it recognizes
the love and devotion of Mary for Jesus. This is, after all, the gospel where
the followers of Jesus are called ‘friends.’
Third, the simple fact that it is the
testimony of a woman is vital to the narrative. It is frequently mentioned
that a women’s testimony was not valid in Jewish culture. Yet, the testimony
that will start the ball rolling is that of a woman, probably the woman closest
to Jesus. This should suggest something of the ‘strangeness’ of
the resurrection to you.
But there is something else going on
in the Johannine resurrection narrative that intersects with the appearance
to Mary Magdalene. When Mary came to the tomb and saw the stone rolled away,
she ran straightaway, lickety-split to Peter and ‘the other disciple,
whom Jesus loved.’ There is then a foot race to the tomb and the other
disciple beats Peter! Unlike Peter, it is recorded that ‘the other disciple’
enters the tomb and ‘sees and believes.’
However, throughout this gospel, whenever
the ‘other disciple/beloved disciple’ is paired with Peter, the
other disciple always seems to come out on top. The other disciple is a follower
of Jesus before Peter, the other disciple is favored at the Last Supper, the
other disciple can enter the High Priest’s home while Peter must remain
in the courtyard, where Peter denies Jesus, the other disciple stands at the
Cross in solidarity with Jesus, and in the last chapter it is the beloved
disciple who recognizes Jesus, not Peter.
There is something going on here with
the way the Johannine tradition sees Peter and ultimately Petrine authority,
and probably the influence of Peter/James on the development of the Jesus
tradition. It is not that the author accuses them of fiction, rather, he tells
his story from the perspective of one who was there before Peter came on the
scene. The telling of the story of Jesus from the perspective of the Fourth
Gospel helps expose the way the Synoptic tradition developed.
We are developing the hypothesis that
two significant versions of Jesus’ stories were told. Both come from
followers of Jesus. We have seen this Holy Week the gospel through the lens
of the Johannine tradition. We can appreciate the wisdom of the church that
included it in the canon, in spite of its use by certain Gnostic groups. The
Asia Minor tradition, which includes both Paul and the Fourth Gospel, is as
important to the life of Jesus research as that of the Synoptic tradition.
Either this page has not yet been completed, or we have not found any significant textual issues in the lectionary texts for this Sunday.
Introductory Articles
We will add articles as we are able,
or as users of the site request them, so if you have suggestions for additional
pieces, please write to us!
"Introduction
to Mimetic Theory"
"Mimesis"
"The
Scapegoat"
"The
Pillars of Culture"
"Jesus"
"The
Four Gospels"
A Brief Introduction
to Luke
What's New: (Hover your mouse over to pause cycling)
Acts 10:34-43 or Is 25:6-9
Ps 118:1-2,14-24
1 Cor 15:1-11 or Acts 10:34-43
Jn 20:1-18 or Mk 16:1-8
(Acts 10:34-43)
Then Peter began to speak to them: "I truly understand that God shows
no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right
is acceptable to him. You know the message he sent to the people of Israel,
preaching peace by Jesus Christ--he is Lord of all. That message spread throughout
Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John announced: how God
anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power; how he went
about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God
was with him. We are witnesses to all that he did both in Judea and in Jerusalem.
They put him to death by hanging him on a tree; but God raised him on the
third day and allowed him to appear, not to all the people but to us who were
chosen by God as witnesses, and who ate and drank with him after he rose from
the dead. He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is
the one ordained by God as judge of the living and the dead. All the prophets
testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of
sins through his name."
(Isaiah 25:6-9)
On this mountain the LORD of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich
food, a feast of well-aged wines, of rich food filled with marrow, of well-aged
wines strained clear. And he will destroy on this mountain the shroud that
is cast over all peoples, the sheet that is spread over all nations; he will
swallow up death forever. Then the Lord GOD will wipe away the tears from
all faces, and the disgrace of his people he will take away from all the earth,
for the LORD has spoken. It will be said on that day, Lo, this is our God;
we have waited for him, so that
he might save us. This is the LORD for whom we have waited; let us be glad
and rejoice in his salvation.
(1 Corinthians 15:1-11)
Now I would remind you, brothers and sisters, of the good news that I proclaimed
to you, which you in turn received, in which also you stand, through which
also you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the message that I proclaimed
to you--unless you have come to believe in vain. For I handed on to you as
of first importance what I in turn had received: that Christ died for our
sins in accordance with the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he
was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures, and that he
appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five
hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though
some have died. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last
of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. For I am the least
of the apostles, unfit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church
of God. But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me has
not been in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them--though
it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me. Whether then it was I
or they, so we proclaim and so you have come to believe.
(Acts 10:34-43)
Then Peter began to speak to them: "I truly understand that God shows
no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right
is acceptable to him. You know the message he sent to the people of Israel,
preaching peace by Jesus Christ--he is Lord of all. That message spread throughout
Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John announced: how God
anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power; how he went
about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God
was with him. We are witnesses to all that he did both in Judea and in Jerusalem.
They put him to death by hanging him on a tree; but God raised him on the
third day and allowed him to appear, not to all the people but to us who were
chosen by God as witnesses, and who ate and drank with him after he rose from
the dead. He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is
the one ordained by God as judge of the living and the dead. All the prophets
testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of
sins through his name."
(John 20:1-18)
Early on the first day of the week, while
it was still dark, Mary Magdalene came to the tomb and saw that the stone
had been removed from the tomb. So she ran and went to Simon Peter and the
other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved, and said to them, "They have
taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid him."
Then Peter and the other disciple set out and went toward the tomb. The two
were running together, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the
tomb first. He bent down to look in and saw the linen wrappings lying there,
but he did not go in. Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into
the tomb. He saw the linen wrappings lying there, and the cloth that had been
on Jesus' head, not lying with the linen wrappings but rolled up in a place
by itself. Then the other disciple, who reached the tomb first, also went
in, and he saw and believed; for as yet they did not understand the scripture,
that he must rise from the dead. Then the disciples returned to their homes.
But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb. As she wept, she bent over to look
into the tomb; and she saw two angels in white, sitting where the body of
Jesus had been lying, one at the head and the other at the feet. They said
to her, "Woman, why are you weeping?" She said to them, "They
have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid him."
When she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but
she did not know that it was Jesus. Jesus said to her, "Woman, why are
you weeping? Whom are you looking for?" Supposing him to be the gardener,
she said to him, "Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you
have laid him, and I will take him away." Jesus said to her, "Mary!"
She turned and said to him in Hebrew, "Rabbouni!" (which means Teacher).
Jesus said to her, "Do not hold on to me, because I have not yet ascended
to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, 'I am ascending to my
Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" Mary Magdalene went
and announced to the disciples, "I have seen the Lord"; and she
told them that he had said these things to her.
(Mark 16:1-8)
When the sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and
Salome bought spices, so that they might go and anoint him. And very early
on the first day of the week, when the sun had risen, they went to the tomb.
They had been saying to one another, "Who will roll away the stone for
us from the entrance to the tomb?" When they looked up, they saw that
the stone, which was very large, had already been rolled back. As they entered
the tomb, they saw a young man, dressed in a white robe, sitting on the right
side; and they were alarmed. But he said to them, "Do not be alarmed;
you are looking for Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He has been raised;
he is not here. Look, there is the place they laid him. But go, tell his disciples
and Peter that he is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see him,
just as he told you." So they went out and fled from the tomb, for terror
and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were
afraid.
New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright
1989, Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches
of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights
reserved.
Occasional Articles
As with the Introductory Articles, we
will add other articles as time permits or as our readers request. If you
have a suggestion for anything, please let us know.
Michael Hardin
Is the Apocalypse Inevitable?: Native American Prophecy and the Mimetic Theory presented to the Colloquium on Violence and Religion 2008
Michael's Essay for a Celebration Volume honoring Rene Girard
Michael's Response to Willard Swartley's Covenent of Peace at the November Colloquium and Violence Meeting
Does
Peace Make A Difference? - Michael's essay in response to Rick
Warren's P.E.A.C.E. plan (which somehow never mentions peace).
An Analysis of Rick Warren - Michael's response to "The Purpose Driven Life."
"The
God of Pat Robertson" - a response to Pat Robertson's words
to the people of Dover, PA.
"A
response to Charles Stanley's "A Nation at War"
"Must
God be violent? A Diagnosis and Prescription for Modern Christianity"
The
Scapegoat: Christologies in Conflict - A Study in Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Biblical
Testaments as a Marriage of Convenience: Rene Girard and Biblical Interpretation
Finding
Our Way Home: A Brief Note On The Authority and Interpretation of Scripture
"Does
The Passion of the Christ Preach the Gospel?"
A
sermon for the holiday devoted to Dr. Martin Luther King. (requires
Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
GRASPING
GOD: Philippians 2: 1-11 in the Light of Mimetic Theory
Rene Girard and the Recovery of Early Christian Perspectives (Brethren Life and Thought)
The Dynamics of Violence and the Imitation of Christ in Maximus Confessor (St. Vladimir's Theological Quarterly)
"EcoSpirituality"
Or What Happens When You Sit Down With A French Literary Critic
Jeff Krantz
Mighty
One or Crucified Messiah? Competing Christologies and the Chiastic
Structure of Mark's Gospel
There's
No Such Thing as the Rapture - A sermon preached at the Church
of the Advent, Westbury (requires Acrobat Reader)
Holy
Scripture and the Consecration of Gene Robinson - a response
to the request of the Windsor Report for a Scriptural rationale. (requires
Adobe's Acrobat Reader)
Worship - The Redemption of Desire by Jeff Krantz
Myth
and Film - a piece written for the City of Angels Film Festival
The Stations of the Cross - Rewritten by Jeff Krantz
A Dramatic Presentation of the Stations of the Cross for Youth by Barb Fabijan-Waddell
Escaping
the Power of "My" - A NonViolent Approach to Stewardship
Preaching
Peace in Hollywood: The Theologies of Terminator, Lord of the Rings, and the
Matrix
V
for Vendetta - The Name Says It All A review of the movie.
Essays, Sermons and Liturgical Pieces by Friends of Preaching Peace
"Jesus and the Gibeonites: Reading the Bible from the Perspective of the Hidden Victim" by James Warren.
Mark Heim's "No More of This" - A hymn on Nonviolent Atonement
Kate Layzer's "No More of This" - A hymn on Nonviolent Atonement (and inspiration for Mark Heim's hymn!)
Alan Cork, "Transformation" in L'Arche: A Mimetic Account presented to the Colloquium on Violence and Religion 2008
"The Wisdom of God's Peace" a sermon by Jim Amstutz, co-pastor of Michael's church.
Girard's Christology - Per Bjornar Grande
Violence, Anarchy and Scripture: Jacques Ellul and Rene Girard - Matthew Patillo
Comparing
Plato's Understanding of Mimesis to Girard's - Per Bjorner Grande
C. Frank Terhune, an Easter Sermon: "God's Big But" (no kidding!)
Gerald Biesecker-Mast's paper from Theologia Pacis on Pacifist Gospel Epstimology.
An essay by the Rev. John Hill on Mimetic Theory and Catechesis